Roundabouts: Variations in design lead to large differences in behavior |
<< Previous |
The MIG Study has proposed one-lane roundabouts for NM502. However, two-lane roundabouts are an obvious alternative if capacity limitations of one-lane roundabouts are a problem, and there will undoubtedly be future discussions of using two-lane roundabouts. The figure below illustrates the yield rules for 2-lane roundabouts.
There are actually worse difficulties than this, some of which rear their ugly heads if you (misguidedly) allow two lanes into the roundabout. The diagram below shows the traffic turns allowed in a typical two-lane roundabout, according to rules of the road in New Mexico and Colorado. Whether a given merge or lane-change conflict occurs depends only on the random arrival times of vehicles. If a glance at the diagram above does not intimidate you, I suggest that you trace some paths for typical movements and look carefully at the sources of conflicting traffic. Or, if you are a pedestrian, imagine a crossing, and consider that the cars coming from these various directions are trying to avoid hitting each other—how much time do you think they have to notice and avoid you? Bicyclists and motorcyclists, what do you think? Single-lane roundabout safety is discussed on the previous page. Only a little imagination is needed to see that two-lane roundabouts pose accident dangers not present in single-lane roundabouts. The first significant difference is that average speeds are higher, 25 mph for a typical two-lane design. Experience with actual two-lane roundabouts confirms these greater risks. Collected safety data for two-lane roundabouts is difficult to find. There are, however, some case studies, such as those of Venice, FL and the Albany, NY area (below). These show accident rates for two-lane roundabouts that can be much higher than those of comparable signalized intersections. Finally, note that there are subtle installation-dependent safety factors. Traffic density, approach characteristics, lane widths, and local driver habits and abilities lead to variable performance in different cases. Some problems can be mitigated by minor adjustments to the roundabout, while others lead to major intersection changes. |
||
The Venice, Florida 2-lane roundabout, built in 2012, is dangerous and does not serve its purpose well for many users, as indicated by the following news reports. |
||
MySunCoast (WWSB) article: "Venice roundabout has residents afraid to enter", Bobeth Yates, 9/29/14
|
||
Sarasota Herald-Tribune article: "Venice roundabout: Worst intersection in Sarasota County?", Christi Womack, 8/15/15 . This article has a good video of the roundabout in operation.
|
||
A personal report: My wife and I drove through this roundabout several times while visiting Florida in January, 2016, before we had read these articles. In spite of a lot of experience driving the Los Alamos San Ildefonso roundabout, we found the Venice, FL experience quite intimidating. Fortunately, we did not increase the number of accidents. | ||
A 2011 Albany Times-Union article discusses the poor accident record for a string of roundabouts in the Albany, NY area (first mentioned on the previous page) and reveals significant safety problems for vehicles. Here are some passages that I consider very telling.
So, the roundabout builders and operators blame the safety problems on the drivers! Perhaps the drivers didn't get the memo about roundabouts being safer? Sad story. |
<< Previous |